On the matter of religion you claim to be neutral and that's obviously position you would like. But isn't as easy as that. I'm an atheist and I try to live just by reason. Truly deeply religious people live, literally, in a different world to me and my problem with religious people is that they abandon reason and instead made a leap of faith and place all their reliance on a set of diktats from the religious leaders and books (older th better). Consider this example. A truly deeply religious person who is a terrorist can blow up a plane load of people and not really done any damage at all. All the victims of the disaster are not really dead at all they are all alive and well and in a better place than they were on earth. They are with their God. The only damage done is a temporary separation from their loved ones, who naturally grieve and miss their friends but know, or should know, that they will soon be reunited in heaven.
That is the problem with the all-time foundation.net. In your scenario the same now applies to an atheist terrorist. If I decide that it is in the best interests of whatever my cause is to blow up an aeroplane, I do not really kill anyone. If I have a belief in the all-time then I know all these people will meet again with me on the AllTime. I can describe to them what I was trying to do and seek and get their forgiveness. So long as I give cogent reasons for believing that my action was going to improve the world then they should forgive me, given that the crime was a tiny one of a temporary separation from their loved ones and not their actual death. That is a problem with all-time scenario that it paints. If one were to embrace it it skews the whole ethical viewpoint in a very unhealthy way. Your efforts to be neutral I'm afraid bear bitter fruit.
